Nominations are Open
Apr. 30th, 2017 04:42 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
You get four fandom slots, eight “character” slots, and four canon helpers.
Fandoms
This should be rather self-explanatory. Any fandom is eligible. This includes RPF, original works, and crossovers. Fandoms based on fan based works will be allowed in on a case by case basis. For this section you should try and go for the more umbrella level of the fandom such as MCU, DCAU, or Dangan Ronpa – All Media Types. Fandoms will be further subdivided using Canon Helpers, which is covered in a later section of this guide.
Characters
You may nominate any female character or group of female characters under the character field. If a character’s status as female is uncertain then comment. I will normally accept it if you make a case where I can reasonably see why you interpret this character as female. I will also accept non-specific original female characters. So original mad scientist is fine, Dr. Mean your OC is not. If a character is confirmed to exist but doesn’t have a canonical gender, for example a wizard that is mentioned but never showed up, they can be nominated.
You may also nominate groups. This should be in the form of Group: Alice & Sally. Groups do not imply a specific relationship. They just mean that the person creating for that tag has to include all the characters. You may add as many characters as you want to the tag. All characters in the group must be eligible for that fandom on their own. Groups must be a clearly defined list of characters. Don’t nominate Group: Female Avengers, instead nominate Group: Natasha Romanoff & Wanda Maximoff. Groups should only be nominated in character slots. Do not put them in relationships.
RPF nominations should not include anybody under the age of 18. I will not accept non-famous family and friends. Any RPF nominations can be removed at the request of that individual. I reserve the rights to reject any RPF on reasons of bad taste.
Canon Helpers
Canon helpers should be nominated under the relationship field. The format is CH: Guardians of the Galaxy, CH: Madoka Magica anime series, or CH: Final Fantasy X. Canon helpers will be used to make sure that you only match on parts of a fandom that you are familiar with. These will be used for things such as adaptations versus original or what part of a large fandom do you want. In order for someone to match to you both of you must be offering and requesting at least one canon helper in common in addition to the normal fandom, character, and medium requirements. Only canon helpers go in relationships, nothing else.
The advantages of this system is that fewer groups will have to go under crossovers. It allows both the people that want their fandoms grouped together and the ones that want them to be split apart to be accommodated. So if you are say only interested in the Agents of SHIELD part of the MCU then you’d select MCU as your fandom, the relevant characters/groups, and then CH: Agents of SHIELD. Only somebody interested in writing/arting that part of the MCU would be matched to you. While someone else that wants everybody and everything could also be accommodated.
If I choose to fold your fandom under an umbrella fandom I will add the canon helper myself. If you require more canon helpers than what I’ve allowed then comment and I will manually add them in.
If you feel your fandom needs to be split up further than what canon helpers would allow then contact me and explain why.
Tolkien Discussion
Date: 2017-04-30 12:50 pm (UTC)Tolkien is one of those fandoms that I'm not sure if it is too complicated for the canon helpers. I don't want to separate every single little thing out, but I'm also unsure how much to group things together and then use canon helpers for specificity.
I'd like suggestions on how to subdivide you guys and what canon helpers would go with each. Would putting The Hobbit & Lord of the Rings (with canon helpers specifying movie and book) together and then putting everything else under The Silmarillion and other histories of Middle-Earth - J. R. R. Tolkien work?
Re: Tolkien Discussion
Date: 2017-04-30 01:27 pm (UTC)Silm and other histories is a good category since it is fairly separate from Hobbit and LotR. I could see CHs for Children of Húrin and the Akallabêth, but those might not even strictly be necessary, since CoH can be subsumed in "other histories" and is contained in the Silm in a less detailed version, and the Akallabêth (the part of the story dealing with Númenor and its fall) is self-contained by definition.
For LotR and the Hobbit, there should definitely be options to separate out books and movies, since those are the big dividing lines, so CH: LotR (book), LotR (movies) (or CH: LotR Jackson Movies if anyone wants to make sure they end up with Bakshi movie fic, but I doubt that's going to be a problem), CH: Hobbit (book) and CH: Hobbit (movies) would be good to have.
Re: Tolkien Discussion
From:Re: Tolkien Discussion
Date: 2017-05-02 04:29 am (UTC)Re: Tolkien Discussion
From:Re: Tolkien Discussion
From:Re: Tolkien Discussion
Date: 2017-05-02 04:42 am (UTC)Re: Tolkien Discussion
From:Re: Tolkien Discussion
From:Re: Tolkien Discussion
From:Re: Tolkien Discussion
From:Marvel Comics Discussion
Date: 2017-04-30 01:14 pm (UTC)I'm not combining you guys with MCU. Will the canon helpers be enough for establishing particular universes/series or do you require further subdivision?
DC Comics Discussion
Date: 2017-04-30 01:15 pm (UTC)Will the canon helpers be enough for establishing particular universes/series or do you require further subdivision?
Re: DC Comics Discussion
Date: 2017-05-01 04:34 am (UTC)Re: DC Comics Discussion
From:no subject
Date: 2017-05-01 08:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-01 05:47 pm (UTC)I am currently sitting on a bunch of Star Wars noms until I decide how to handle it?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2017-05-02 03:43 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2017-05-02 10:59 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2017-05-03 09:43 pm (UTC) - Expandno subject
Date: 2017-05-01 03:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-01 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-01 05:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-02 04:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-02 12:33 pm (UTC)Yes, the sign up form is going to require choosing at least one canon helper. I can manually add them in, but it saves time for me if they are nominated. CH: fandom name is fine.
Star Trek
Date: 2017-05-02 08:47 am (UTC)If you don't decide to umbrella Trek, just let me know and I can edit my nominations accordingly so you don't need to tweak them.
Re: Star Trek
Date: 2017-05-02 12:48 pm (UTC)Re: Star Trek
From:Re: Star Trek
From:Re: Star Trek
From:Re: Star Trek
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2017-05-03 12:42 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Star Trek
From:Re: Star Trek
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2017-05-03 04:39 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Star Trek
From:Re: Star Trek
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2017-05-04 12:24 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Star Trek
From:Re: Star Trek
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2017-05-03 04:32 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Star Trek
From:no subject
Date: 2017-05-03 12:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-03 04:45 pm (UTC)The tag changed because I made a typo when changing it away from the AO3 canonical tag. Characters from legends, myth, religion, works on the public domain, and other resources that are often used in modern works have a tendency to wander in their canonical forms. So its usually just easier for me to preemptively change the tag to something that won't wander rather than fix it after the fact. I will fix the tag.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2017-05-05 02:43 am (UTC)Can we nominate 'canon character & original character' groups under non-original canons?
Ovipository tentacle creatures or monsters count as female characters?
no subject
Date: 2017-05-05 03:10 am (UTC)Sure. You can do non-specific characters. So Group: Melinda May & Monster is fine, or Group: Melinda May & Ovipository Tentacle Creature is fine, but not Group: Melinda May & Franzilikis who is your specific monster OC. Ovipository tentacle creatures don't exist, and if they do don't tell me, so yeah as long as they are written as female Ovipository tentacle creatures it is fine by me.
no subject
Date: 2017-05-05 03:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-05 05:22 am (UTC)Got it.
no subject
Date: 2017-05-05 01:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-05 08:17 pm (UTC)Because she's a character I was going to ask about in my massive questions post once nominations close. It isn't clear if it is the Earth 2 version of the character or the Earth 1, if it is the Earth 1 version I want to give people in the fandom a chance to voice if they feel she counts as a distinct and separate character from Caitlin Snow.
no subject
Date: 2017-05-05 10:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-06 12:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-06 12:33 am (UTC)"Canon helpers should be nominated under the relationship field."
Because AO3 can not be customized. The relationship field is where the canon helpers go as it says
Girl Genius
Date: 2017-05-06 01:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-06 03:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-06 02:15 pm (UTC)I was worried about this as well, like I mentioned on my example under the Star Trek thread (if I want request/offer both AOS and TOS, but I want only TOS!Uhura, it's going to be a problem).
(no subject)
From:Transformers?
Date: 2017-05-06 06:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-06 04:40 pm (UTC)CH: Dragon Age II
CH: Dragon Age II (video game)
CH: Dragon Age Inquisition (video game)
CH: Dragon Age: Inquisition (Video Game)
no subject
Date: 2017-05-07 12:28 am (UTC)Thank you.
no subject
Date: 2017-05-07 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-05-07 08:46 pm (UTC)I will fix it when I do my next round of tagset fixes.