pumpkinkingmod (
pumpkinkingmod) wrote in
everywoman2017-04-13 09:44 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Questions
1. Do you prefer fandoms that have lots of related parts be grouped together for ease of requesting and offering groups or separated out to make it easier to request/offer any? I do have two ideas on how to accommodate those that might want only a specific part of a fandom.
EDIT: I don't mean throwing everything under one banner and calling it a day. I mean more like "MCU - Netflix shows" which would include Daredevil, Jessica Jones, Luke Cage, and Iron Fist.
2. If fandoms are merged would you like more nomination slots?
3. Would you rather be allowed to nominate relationships or stick to the current groups method? If I decide to allow relationships that will include any relationship that is comprised of at least 50% canonical female characters. Sticking to groups will maintain the current status quo.
EDIT: I don't mean throwing everything under one banner and calling it a day. I mean more like "MCU - Netflix shows" which would include Daredevil, Jessica Jones, Luke Cage, and Iron Fist.
2. If fandoms are merged would you like more nomination slots?
3. Would you rather be allowed to nominate relationships or stick to the current groups method? If I decide to allow relationships that will include any relationship that is comprised of at least 50% canonical female characters. Sticking to groups will maintain the current status quo.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-04-14 02:35 am (UTC)(link)2. No opinion.
3. I like the current format.
no subject
I do see the issue that combining fandoms would make it easier to offer/request groups, but there are other exchanges which concentrate more on relationships, and I'm happy for this exchange to be more about character-based matching.
2. I think that would help.
3. I lean towards nominating relationships because it's more intuitive, but I'm fine with whatever works best to make the exchange run smoothly.
no subject
In regards to Tolkien my thoughts were to do it as Hobbit & Lord of the Rings - Jackson movies, Hobbit & Lord of the Rings - Books, then Silmarillion stands alone. I wasn't going to just throw everything in one huge pile and call it a day. Just a bit more grouped up than before.
no subject
There are almost no female characters in the Hobbit book, so I don't think it makes much difference one way or the other in this case. I'd be okay with grouping the Hobbit and LOTR books together, though I don't know if others might have other opinions.
I'm not really in movies fandom, so I'll leave it to others to comment on that.
no subject
2. Depends on the kind of merging
3. Don't mind either way
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
EDIT: I don't mean throwing everything under one banner and calling it a day. I mean more like "MCU - Netflix shows" which would include Daredevil, Jessica Jones, Luke Cage, and Iron Fist.
I prefer them to be separate, because even if all the shows take place in the same universe, that doesn't mean that I'm familiar with all of them. I've seen most of Jessica Jones, I've heard about Daredevil on Tumblr but never watched it, I know less than nothing about the show Luke Cage--and I wouldn't watch Iron Fist if you paid me.
Also, there can be significant differences in characterization between shows or movies that share a universe.
2. If fandoms are merged would you like more nomination slots?
I'd really rather that they weren't merged at all. Other than that, I don't have an opinion at this time.
3. Would you rather be allowed to nominate relationships or stick to the current groups method? If I decide to allow relationships that will include any relationship that is comprised of at least 50% canonical female characters. Sticking to groups will maintain the current status quo.
I don't see any reason to change the status quo.
no subject
2. No opinion.
3. Groups work well for me.
no subject
2. I can't even remember how many nomination slots we get. Okay, last time it was 4 fandoms & 4 slots per fandom. Which. Yeah, if fandoms are merged, I definitely want more nomination slots.
4. Stick to the groups, please - I like how the setup is now for multiple people.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-04-14 08:42 pm (UTC)(link)1. I think the only fandom(s) I have that might be affected would be Riverdale (TV) vs. Archie Comics. Personally, I'd prefer that those stay separate, as the backstory, characterization, etc. are very different between the two sources.
2. Probably no difference.
3. For this exchange, I prefer the existing group system.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2017-04-15 10:27 pm (UTC)(link)2. Yes
3. I'm not interested in gen fic, so my vote is for any method that enables us to nominate romantic ships as well as gen ships/groups and/or characters.
no subject
2. If fandoms are consolidated, I think you should have more character/relationship slots per fandom. No opinion on more fandoms.
3. I am all for relationships.